Showing posts with label EREV. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EREV. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 19, 2014

VIA Motors eREV Van Gets EPA Approval

via-shuttle-1
Last week Bob Lutz’s plug-in truck maker VIA Motors recieved certification for sale from the EPA for its eREV Van. VIA’s plug-in hybrid vans are now cleared for sale across the country, allowing its Mexican factory to begin production in earnest.
While VIA Motors has a few demonstration fleets out to companies like California electric utility PG&E, its mostly been relegated to a few press test drives and auto shows. But Lutz, who is Chairman of VIA Motors, has displayed great confidence in his product and has even gone so far as saying that the Chevy Volt should have been a truck instead.
“We see our eREV vehicles as an important part of the fleets of the future. This all-important EPA certification validates our concept of integrating VIA’s proprietary powertrain into OEM vehicles to deliver both economical and clean vehicle solutions,” said Pablo Acedo, CEO of VIA Motors.
“If we are going to see main stream adoption of electric vehicles, the technology must deliver a good return on investment to the largest segment of the auto business, namely trucks and vans. That’s why I am so confident in VIA and proudly serve as Chairman,” added Bob Lutz. With twenty-three EREV vans already made and another three in transit, VIA Motors finally looks ready for primetime.
Offering 40-miles of electric driving range and up to 100 MPG over the course of an average day’s driving, VIA hopes customers will see the long term benefits to electrified commercial vehicles. Unfortunately history has proven businesses are less likely to take the plunge into plug-in cars, though VIA is hoping to finally reverse that trend.

Saturday, November 2, 2013

VIA Motors EREV Van Passes Crash Tests; Goes On Sale This Fall

VIA Motors EREV Van
VIA Motors EREV Van
VIA Motors has announced that it recently finished crash testing on its new extended-range cargo van.
VIA Van First to Come to Market and First to Pass Independent Crash Tests
VIA Van First to Come to Market and First to Pass Independent Crash Tests
VIA Motors president, Alan Perriton, chimed in on the crash-test milestone, stating:
“We were very pleased with the results of the crash testing of our electric cargo van. The engineering work done to integrate the VIA’s electric technology has been exceptional and the vehicles have exceeded our expectations in all tests that were performed. We are now moving on to complete certification and begin mass production.”
The electron-sipping workhorse should go on sale this fall according to VIA.
But wait…there’s more.
In a recent social media post, VIA indicated that “they’ll soon be rolling in droves in Southern California.”
As for the EREV truck, VIA just posted this on its Facebook page:
“the VTRUX is currently in production focusing on fleet orders. VIA is taking pre-orders for the general public for its 402HP extended-range electric trucks for early 2014 delivery.”
With VIA saying that its EREV vehicles can save owner upwards of $36,000 on gas in an eight-year period, let’s hope VIA stays on track and delivers as promised.
VIA Van Specifications
VIA Van Specifications

Thursday, August 1, 2013

VIA Motors Joins With PG&E On Neighborhood-Powering Pickup

via-motors-pg&e

Events like Hurricane Sandy have shown just how fragile our power grid has become. Deploying fuel-intensive diesel generators can be all but impossible when roads are impassable, but green truck builder VIA is teaming up with energy company PG&E to test pickup trucks with the potential to power entire neighborhoods with their huge battery packs.
VIA Motors is banking big bucks on its plug-in hybrid technology that it claims offers fleet owners much better fuel economy and job site performance than conventional, gas-powered pickups. To demonstrate the usefulness of their hybrid trucks, VIA teamed with Northern California’s PG&E to demonstrate a vehicle that can carry a crew, tools, and up to 125 kW of power from an on-board generator.
In an emergency situation, the VTRUX plug-in hybrid trucks could be deployed to powerless neighborhoods and plugged into the grid, providing at least a temporary solution to the lack of electricity. It’s a novel idea, one that could make dealing with future outages a lot easier. The design also saves fuel, allowing the first 40 miles of driving to rely on battery power, with another 400 miles to go once the on-board generator takes over. VIA is also reportedly working on a production version of their 800 horsepower XTRUX, boasting twice as much power as the current model.
Other ideas have included mobile pedal bikes hooked up to generatorsmobile solar panels, and used Volt batteries to provide temporary relief.  And if freak weather events like Hurricane Sandy become more commonplace, as many climatologists fear, we’ll need all the good ideas we can get.


Source: Plug-In Cars

Sunday, March 24, 2013

Kymco to Build BMW i3 Extended-range Hybrid Engine


Chinese-built BMW i3 engine

Taiwanese scooter-builder Kymco will be responsible for BMW’s upcoming i3 extended-range electric car, according to reports circulating in the media this week.
Adding plausibility to the reports is the fact that Kymco, which has factories in China and Indonesia, is already a BMW supplier – selling motorcycle engines to the German company that can be found in the BMW G450X enduro, as well as the BMW C-class maxi-scooters that debuted back in 2011.
Expect the Kymco/BMW motor to look something like this …

Kymco/BMW drivetrain

… and for the engine to be fed by a small fuel tank, which should stretch the i3′s range to almost 220 mi on a combined diet of electrons and fossils. Keep in mind, that’s adding to the i3′s projected 80-ish mile range on a fully charged battery.
In addition, it should be noted that this range-extender is just that: an OPTIONAL ADD-ON that BMW is offering to i3 buyers who suffer from “range anxiety”. This is opposite of what we’d find in cars like the Chevy Volt or Fisker Karma, for example, which are sold as EVs that feature range-extending ICE engines as standard equipment.
More than the functionality of the engine itself, the bigger question BMW might have to face is: will the public accept a premium price tag on (what could be perceived as) a Chinese car?
We’ll soon see …



SourceHybridCars.

Sunday, September 2, 2012

Is the 2013 Chevrolet Volt the Ultimate Retirement Vehicle?



Imagine the following scenario: you and your partner are rapidly approaching retirement, looking to downsize your car, and trying to plan for your financial future. You’re ready to buy a new car, but you want something that’s relatively green and cheap to run.  

Could the 2013 Chevrolet Volt offer you everything you need in a retirement car? 

Running costs

Many retirees find they only make regular short trips in an average day, with the occasional longer road trip a few times a year.

Thanks to its on-board 16.5 kilowatt-hour battery pack, the Volt can travel an EPA-approved 38 miles per charge without using any gasoline, meaning daily trips out and about town can be made without worrying about gas prices.

For longer trips across state, the range-extending gasoline engine can provide enough range to get you between cities without worrying about recharging. 

Better still, because it comes with a 110-volt Level 1 charging station as standard, you won’t have to shell out for an expensive, 240-volt, Level 2 charging station to be installed in your home unless you really want one. It’s worth noting however, that charging at 110-volts takes a lot longer than it does at 240-volts. 

2012 Chevrolet Volt
2012 Chevrolet Volt
Refined, comfortable interior

While the 2013 Chevrolet Volt is no luxury car, its interior is comfortable enough on long trips to keep most passengers happy.
Adjustable, heated front seats also help provide instant heat on cold days, whilst a pre-heating setting allows you to program the car to heat or cool itself up before you get in. 
Cabin noise is also kept to a minimum, with transition between electric and gasoline power sources smooth and made without fuss. 
When it comes to load space, the Volt’s load bay floor, while easy to reach, only provides 10.6 cubic feet of space.  
However, the rear seats fold down to give a more useful, flat load bay area of 18 cubic feet.
Downsized
Because your kids have grown up, left home and have cars of their own, you won’t need a minivan or SUV any more. 
And while it’s always nice to have the extra room an SUV offers, you’ll find yourself paying extra for the privilege in gas-bills.
While the Chevrolet Volt is classed as a compact car, its two front and two rear individual seats ensure there’s more than enough room for all but the tallest of drivers and passengers, while adequate lumbar support makes driving it long-distance a pleasure. 
Power
2012 Chevrolet Volt
2012 Chevrolet Volt
Even if you’re retired, it doesn’t mean you don’t like the thrill of accelerating fast. 
Although the Volt’s 1.4-liter engine isn’t exactly what you’d call exciting, its 111 kilowatt motor provides more than enough torque to let you out-run all but the sportiest of cars at the stop light. 
And because it’s got a continuously-variable transmission, there are no unpleasant automatic gear-shifts to worry about either.

Downsides?

While the Chevrolet Volt does provide comfortable, efficient motoring for those retirees who want to travel beyond the range of an all-electric car, it isn’t the easiest of cars to get in and out of if you have restricted mobility.

Then there’s cost. 

Starting at $39,145 before state and federal tax incentives, it also isn’t exactly cheap to buy. 
If you’re downsizing from a two-car household to a one-car household however, you may be able to offset some of that high cost with a double trade-in. 

Add in the $7,500 federal tax credit and any local incentives however, and you could find that $39,145 drops significantly.

Is it for you?


Source: Green Car Reports

Saturday, March 3, 2012

Fisker – Not Fast Enough to Outrun Angry Investors

The hits just keep on coming for electric vehicle (EV) maker Fisker Automotive Inc. (Fisker). An investor is suing the company for alleged fraud and breach of duty in the sale of company stock.

Fisker makes great looking EVs but they just cannot keep their books in order and now they are being sued by an investor by the name of Daniel Wray. Between October 2009 and April 2011 Wray bought about $210,000 in unregistered preferred Fisker stock. A nice investment in a company that looked to have potential, that is until things began to go south for Fisker.

Wray alleges he received word from Fisker on January 18th in the form of a letter informing him that due to the need for equity capital financing there was now a pay to play action in effect — Fisker wanted Wray to invest $83,922.32 on top of his previous investments. If Wray failed to do so by January 27th Wray would allegedly lose rights that he received when he first purchased Fisker stock. Rights such as a discounted price if the company went public, protection against dilution of his shares by later purchasers, and preference in a bankruptcy.

The lawsuit brought by Wray is basically saying that Fisker’s preferred stock is a scam.

To further complicate matters, the U.S. Department of Energy has frozen $336 million of Fiskers $529 million loan from last May because Fisker failed to meet a number of undisclosed milestones. Plus in the past few months Fisker has closed their Delaware plant and laid off 71 workers in Delaware and Orange County.

At a time when Fisker could really use some money from outside investors this lawsuit, and the allegations brought by the lawsuit, mean more financial hardship for a once promising company. This is not the first time Fisker has been sued due to questionable business practices. In 2008 Tesla Motors filed a lawsuit accusing Henrik Fisker of signing a design contract in order to only get an inside look at Tesla’s confidential design information and secrets, and then launch Fisker Automotive and announce a competing EV less than a year later. The judge in the case eventually ruled in favor of Fisker, denying Tesla’s claim that its competitor had pirated Tesla’s hybrid technology.

The Fisker Karma sells for $103,000.


Source: Gas2.0

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Some Chevy dealers rejecting Volt allocations from GM


Chevrolet dealers in some U.S. markets are turning away Chevrolet Volts that General Motors is allocating to them, indicating that consumers remain concerned that the extended-range plug-in vehicles pose an additional safety risk relative to convention cars, are too expensive or are otherwise not as desired as GM thinks, Automotive News (subs. req.) reported.

New York City-area Chevy dealerships took just 31 of the 104 Volts allocated to them last month, while one Northern California dealer turned away all six Volts offered to him, according to the publication. Another East Coast dealer reported a "huge dropoff" in Volt interest. Overall, dealer orders for Volts have declined, Automotive News said, citing GM spokesman Rob Peterson.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said late last week that it finished its two-month investigation into the crash test that resulted in a fire three weeks after the fact last summer, and concluded that neither the Volt nor other electric vehicles pose more of a fire risk than conventional vehicles.

Earlier this month, USA Today reported that GM has prepared an advertising campaign that would be launched in the event of more negative reports about Chevrolet Volt or a negative outcome of the Congressional hearing that takes place tomorrow. Last month, GM sold 1,529 Volts, a record high, and sold 7,671 Volts for all of 2011. GM had previously set a goal of 10,000 Volt sales for 2011.


Source: Autoblog Green

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Fisker hikes Karma price... again... now above $100k


When you're starting up a new luxury automaker – especially a high-end one – it's easy for prices to quickly escalate beyond their anticipated targets. And that's just what's happened with the Fisker Karma.

Way back when (in 2008), the upstart automaker was talking about selling the Karma for $80,000. Then, the initial base MSRP was set at $87,900 until Fisker raised prices again – and began taking orders – for its hybrid luxury at $95,900. As of this Thursday, even this price will jump by some six percent to $102,000.

That's for the base Eco Standard model, while the top Eco Chic trim level will now sell for $116,000. Those who put down deposits at the previous prices, however, will have another month to firm up their orders to get theirs at the original rate.



Source: Autoblog Green

Monday, December 12, 2011

Opel Ampera delayed over Chevy Volt battery fears


Automotive News reports that, as suspected, Opel is delaying delivery of its Ampera extended-range hybrid to customers. The plug-in gas-electric hatchbacks have already arrived at dealers across Europe, but the automaker wants to ensure the vehicles' batteries are safe even in the event of an accident. The delay comes on the heels of a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration evaluation which saw its Chevrolet Volt twin catch fire three weeks after a series of crash tests. Since the Volt and Ampera are mechanically identical, Opel says that it wants to set up a process to deal with the batteries to make sure they're safe.

Both the Volt and the Ampera are assembled at the General Motors plant in Hamtramck, Michigan, and both make use of lithium-ion batteries to power their electric motors. GM has offered to buy back any Chevrolet Volt models from owners concerned about the safety of their vehicle, but few have taken them up on the offer. The company is currently working on a solution to the fire issue, and the U.S. government is investigating why it took NHTSA so long to bring the battery pack problem to light.



Source: Autoblog Green

Friday, December 9, 2011

Solving the Volt’s Extended Range Combined Mode Power Split

Remember when GM finally announced that the Volt did transmit power directly from the internal combustion engine (ICE) to the front wheels in extended-range (AKA charge sustaining) mode?

What a furor it caused! Some were outraged …

But GM did it for a reason: fuel efficiency!

How much of the road horsepower actually goes directly from the ICE to the front wheels at 70 mph? All of it, or just part of it?

We sometimes hear people refer to the Volt’s transmission as being a continuously variable transmission (CVT). Is it really a CVT? The answer is yes, it is continuously variable, but not in the same sense as most CVTs which have a continuously variable torque ratio.

The Volt’s transmission does not have a variable torque ratio but instead it has a continuously variable speed ratio. The torque ratio across the planetary gearset (PG) is fixed.

Consider the following schematic of the Volt’s powertrain in extended range (CS) mode:

Power from the ICE goes into the PG thru the ring gear. Power also goes into the PG thru the sun gear from the main traction motor (MGB). Power comes out the PG through the carrier and is transmitted to the wheels via a 2.16 gear reduction set in the final drive. The power coming out is simply equal to the sum of the power going in minus some small gear losses. The torque is split at a constant ratio depending on the tooth counts of the ring, carrier and sun gears within the PG. In the Volt’s case, the torque split is as shown in the following schematic:

This split is based on knowing the ratios between the ring and carrier with the sun gear locked and the ratio of the sun to carrier with the ring gear locked as shown below.

We know the speed and power out of the PG. The power out is simply the road load and the carrier speed is based on the vehicle speed, tire size and the gear reduction set. We can calculate the torque at the output of the PG based on the following equation: HP=torque (ft-lb) X speed (RPM)/5252

Using the 69/31 percent torque split we then have the torques at the input side of the PG. All we need now is the input side speeds in order to calculate the power split.

In order to figure the speed splits at this 70 mph condition we need to pick an ICE speed which feeds into the ring gear of the PG. I picked an ICE speed that results in the best specific fuel consumption (SFC) from the ICE at 27.3 horsepower (20.4 kw) which is the road load for this condition.

The speed that gives the best SFC at 20 kw out of the ICE is 2,300 rpm. That speed was chosen from a plot of horsepower versus engine speed for peak cycle efficiency (I used a Prius engine map).

Using the selected speed of 2,300 rpm for the ICE and 1,930 rpm for the output (carrier) speed we can solve for the sun (MGB) speed from the PG speed equation derived above. We also can split the torque using the 69/31 percent torque split. Using those speeds and torques we can calculate the power split.

The resultant power split is shown below:

As you can see, the resultant power into the PG almost exactly equals the optimum power for best SFC out of the ICE at 27.3 horsepower road load. In this condition in order to get better SFC out of the ICE we need to add another 4.5 horsepower to the ICE.

To do so, we simply add 4.5 horsepower worth of generator load. So here we have a near perfect match between the ICE and the road load – 82 percent of the power generated from the ICE is being transmitted mechanically directly to the wheels. The remaining 18 percent power is being converted into electricity by the generator and then being fed to the main traction motor.

Conclusion

The Volt is very efficient. It has the potential for Prius mpg in CS Mode with power split engaged.


Source: GM-Volt.com

Thursday, December 8, 2011

2012 Chevrolet Volt | Efficient Driving Tips - VIDEO | Chevrolet

Some driving tips for those readers with a new Volt:

Monday, November 7, 2011

What’s in store for the Gen II Volt?

GM has said a few things about future Volts, but really it amounts to very little. We know the company is working to cut costs, is using the Volt as a development platform, and it’s believed no Voltec derivatives will come before 2015, but what opportunities exist now or near term?

That’s anyone’s guess, but last week two educated guesses were offered by both a writer who’s penned pieces for Popular Mechanics, and his interview subject, a former GM tech director who has since formed his own company.

According to auto writer Gary Witzenburg’s AutoblogGreen interview with, Jon Bereisa, GM’s former director of Advanced Engineering & Technology Strategy, cutting the Volt’s costs and reducing petroleum consumption are presently doable.

Bereisa’s opinion comes after having had his hands in developing the EV1, two-mode hybrid system, and other GM electric vehicles including the Voltec project.

In 2009 he founded Auto Lectrification LLC, and his views are now from the supply side of the industry. As president and CEO, his company stands to gain from the Volt’s advances, but his observations and speculations on cost cutting and efficiency are informative nonetheless.

“The mission was to build the car as fast as we could, which meant using existing parts as much as possible,” Bereisa told Witzenburg. “When you use available components, you’re probably carrying a little more cost and mass than you need, since every component had to do something else, probably in a larger vehicle. So I think literally thousands of dollars can come out of that car, and by the time they get to Gen II, it’ll be a very cost-effective proposition.”

GM has said the battery costs can come down, and Bereisa confirmed this from what he knows.

“About 70 percent of that is cell cost,” he said of the Volt’s battery pack. “I think we’ll see that down to maybe $200 per kwh in two to three years, even without major innovations. And I foresee at least twice the energy density in five to seven years.”

Nor is Bereisa any less optimistic with regards to the Volt’s gasoline generator.

“When we modeled the Volt’s engine, theoretically we could have gotten to high 40s or low 50s mpg in gasoline mode. But we would have had to run it continuously at 3500-3800 rpm and just switch it on and off, and the noise and pleasability wouldn’t work,” Bereisa said. “We had to drop it down, which got us to 37-38 mpg. But I think a lot of fuel economy still can be gained without major expenditures in tooling or engineering.”

Gasoline consumption could be radically cut also, he said, by switching fuels – something GM has said it has no current plans to do.

“You can take it to Brazil, up its compression and have a pure alcohol E100 engine. The rest of the vehicle stays the same,” Bereisa said.”Europeans are in love with biodiesel, so you can use a small direct-injected diesel running on biodiesel fuel. [Eventually] you can take out the engine, generator and battery pack and put a hydrogen fuel cell in front and two hydrogen tanks in back, while the rest stays the same.”

Or less radically, GM could convert the engine to run on E85 – 85-percent ethanol, 15-percent gasoline.

“Today, the average Volt drive is a little over 1,000 miles before refueling. And when the owners refuel, they add back about eight gallons, so that computes to approximately 125 mpg,” he said. “But with E85, only 15 percent of that gallon of fuel is petroleum-based gasoline, so on a gasoline-usage basis, that’s 125 mpg times roughly six, or about 750 mpg … a HUGE improvement! E85 applied to the Voltec architecture would do a phenomenal job of reducing the amount of petroleum being burned.”

The Volt could also stand to lose a few pounds, he said.

“The Volt came in at 1,600-plus kilos. My target was 1,500, with the battery. We borrowed components from other places, and it adds up,” he said.”So a lot can be done just in lightening, which will increase gasoline fuel economy as well as electric range.”

For his part, writer Gary Witzenburg, who has been covering autos, people and technology for 21 years, said his Volt outlook is more bearish.

Witzenburg said he could foresee the Volt getting the typical aero and styling update in three to four years after having also benefited from year-over-year incremental changes just as the 2012 was a minor update over 2011.

And forget about 2015 being the next big year. Witzenburg said the Volt would get “probably a complete makeover by 2017,” and that would be Gen II.

By 2017, Witzenburg says he believes the Gen II Volt will have somewhat improved energy density, and be better, less expensive, with a new appearance.

“The result will be a slightly smaller, much lighter, more fuel efficient and more affordable Volt that can run 35-50 miles on battery power, achieve mid-40s-mpg gasoline economy and sell in the low- to mid-$30Ks,” Witzenburg said. “I also foresee evolving Voltec technology proliferating to other GM vehicles, including larger cars, crossovers, even trucks. And other makers offering EREVs, beginning with Fisker.”

If what Witzenburg says is all that happens, it almost sounds like the initial design target for Gen I. Should he be more bullish?

What do you think?

Bereisa said the technology is here now to make the Volt better, but Witzenburg was not infected by his enthusiasm, even after interviewing him, and writing about some of his ideas.

Is Witzenburg’s relative pessimism justified?

GM’s Chairman and CEO Dan Akerson has said the company foresees a flat 2012 automotive selling year for its entire line-up, which it is prepared to ride out. GM has resisted even spending the money to buy its own stock back at a sub-IPO discount, and is building a “fortress balance sheet,” having been stung by a humbling near-death experience in just the past couple years.

Imbued with a new resolve and conservatism, selling new ICE models in large numbers, having shed legacy costs, and recently cutting a decent deal with the UAW, GM has said it is using the Volt as a showroom draw, even as it prepared to sell 60,000 Volts next year.

In other words, it is not talking about taking any big Voltec chances.

So, is it only pie-in-the-sky to talk about what could be? Or are some of the suggestions Bereisa mentions – or ones you could think of – worth doing?

Will GM surprise us and take chances it has said it is avoiding? Or not?


Source: GM-Volt.com

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Fisker delivers first extended-range Karma

The “world’s first extended-range EV” was launched recently by its American-based company to the applause of techies and green-oriented people of many stripes.

Old news you say? Not so fast. This was not the Chevrolet Volt, but a Fisker Karma delivered July 26 – not to Leonardo DiCaprio as had been reported – but to another VIP.

We will get to the delivery shortly, but first will explain that according to the Irvine, Calif.-based company, a subtle but significant distinction defines the petrol-electric-powered Karma as “extended range” – a description that Chevrolet has contended that it pioneered.


2012 Fisker Karma.

This assertion notwithstanding, these were opening lines to Fisker’s recent press release:

“The Fisker Karma is the world’s first extended range EV – offering responsible luxury, incomparable performance and seating for four. Powered by twin 201 HP electric motors that may be augmented by an on-board engine generator, the Karma is capable of delivering over 300 miles of responsible driving – and a top speed of 125 mph.”

The press release does not say whether “responsible drivingincludes a top speed of 125 mph on American roads. The likely answer is probably not, but and if you have not noticed, it is very easy to misunderstand or react to things read in cyberspace.

Case in point: Since this looked like an example of one-upmanship being played by a company that sourced its engine from GM, and is working to re-purpose one of its old assembly plants, we put in an inquiry to GM’s two media reps assigned to it. Unfortunately, we were told, “Sorry Jeff. We don’t have a comment to respond to this.”

Next we tried Fisker’s Spokesman, Roger Ormisher, and he answered his cell phone – minutes before he said he was ready to call it a day at his hotel room in Milan, Italy. We had been told to direct inquiries to him, but not that he was in Italy instead of California, thus inadvertently managed to get him at 11:45 p.m. Oops.

Although he said he had worked a long day answering questions at a European media driving event, Ormisher instantly forgave apologies for the inopportune timing, and, cheerfully invited a several-minute interview.


It’s not an EREV, it’s an EVer.

We told him GM had refused to comment, so he dove right into that topic to diffuse some of the feelings his company’s press release might have stirred up.

“We don’t see it as competitive, we see it as us, GM, others,” Ormisher said. “We don’t see us as direct competitors, we see us as people involved in the future.”

GM has one solution, Fisker has another, Tesla has another, and so on, he said. Development of electric cars of various sorts is collaborative; the effort is toward a common goal – but Ormisher was otherwise clear that there is a difference between Fisker’s solution and GM’s.

Ormisher said the Karma is truer to the “extended range” concept in that petrol power never mechanically contributes to the wheels turning in the way that the Volt can at times.

“Our understanding is that’s different from the way the Chevrolet Volt is configured,” he said, and there is “no direct connection with the driving wheels.”

Undisputed

Given Chevrolet is not touching this one, we don’t know if there is a debate, but we can report that without controversy Fisker is now fully open for business and working on delivering cars as fast as it can.

This effort began two days ago when Ray Lane became the first person to get one. In addition to being the company’s chairman of the board, and despite being not as famous as Leonardo DiCaprio, Lane is quite accomplished in his own right.


Plush, snappy and functional interior.

Fisker says Lane is a managing partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers in Menlo Park, Calif., also serves as chairman of Carnegie Mellon University and Hewlett-Packard Corporation and as vice chairman of Special Olympics International.

“To be one of the first to have a Fisker Karma in the world is a uniquely satisfying honor for me. Our country, and our business environment – especially here in the Silicon Valley – has been inspired by those who dream and then commit themselves to making their passion real. Henrik Fisker and his devoted team have done just that – combining my passion for driving and the environment,” Lane said. “This is so much more than just another car. The Fisker Karma represents a new era for the automotive industry and I am proud to be driving the dream of all those who have worked so hard to bring this uniquely green and elegant vehicle to market,” Lane concluded.

Good Karma

The Fisker Karma’s 260-horsepower, 2.0-liter, turbocharged, GM-sourced engine feed power to the two electric traction motors when the approximately 50 miles of all-electric range runs out.

Given a 9.5-gallon fuel tank, Fisker says the Karma should be able to cover about 300 miles in all. Ormisher believes the engine was intended for a Pontiac that was never built, and otherwise spec’d for the Karma.

When in Sport mode which the driver must select, Fisker says the Karma’s engine provides maximum electric power to hit a limited speed of 125 mph, and 0-60 time of 5.9 seconds. In the default all-electric Stealth mode, performance is tuned for range and efficiency, these being 0-60 mph in 6.9 seconds and top speed limited to 95 mph.

Ormisher said the company has 45 dealers in the U.S. so far, and did not speak of restrictions in any American regional markets, as Nissan and Chevrolet made by limiting initial roll out of their LEAF and Volt to several states.


Solar roof.

More limiting may be that the California designed and engineered, Finnish-made Karma is still rare, although Ormisher said it will be produced at about 300 units per week.

If interested in test driving one, you may have a better chance in the near term – better than the media, in fact.

Ormisher said Fisker is reversing the usual order of preference and giving dealers first dibs at test drives, then customers, then media.

We at GM-Volt may be able to sample one by October in Pennsylvania, he said, but you might be able to sooner.

Ormisher said Fisker will be doing a “retail road show” with two cars offering demo drives in 45 cities over a period of 104 days.

So far 2,800 test rides are booked for the two cars. Do you think the Karmas will be hammered after a few thousand people hop in and punch-it?

Such is the cost of doing business – one which Ormisher said he feels very good about being a part of. Fisker was founded in 2007, and Ormisher said it is very much an American company and over the past 18 months it has created 550 American jobs.

Fisker also intends to start production of its “project NINA” which for you to read more about, we will break policy and link to Wikipedia because Fisker itself links to it. In short, plans in The First State are to begin production by 2012 of a sub-$40,000 family friendly plug-in hybrid, and by 2014 Fisker expects to be producing 75,000-100,000 vehicles per year.


Well-proportioned from just about every angle.

Ormisher said also the company wants to succeed globally, which explains what he was doing in Italy besides being commendably polite in answering questions so late.

“We believe in the brand,” Ormisher said with enthusiasm. “I think what we are trying to do is redefine luxury so people can define luxury without guilt.”

The Karma starts at just under $100,000. A very thorough media site has all specs, photos, videos and more.


Source: GM-Volt.com

Monday, June 27, 2011

2011 Chevrolet Volt Proves it can be an Electric Wizard Too

2011 Chevrolet Volt charging port

2011 Chevrolet Volt charging port

Enlarge Photo

When is a 2011 Chevrolet Volt not a plug-in hybrid?

When it covers 2,500 miles between fill-ups.

That’s how far Maryland resident Jeff Parmet has driven in his 2011 Chevrolet Volt in the past six months. In fact, he’s just visited the gas pump for the first time since buying the car.

Until its release last winter, Chevrolet was pretty adamant that its 2011 Volt was a range-extended electric car. That is, until it was disclosed that under circumstance, its range-extending gasoline engine could directly drive the front wheels, making it a plug-in hybrid.

A whole group of electric car fans were horrified. “How could General Motors have cheated us?” they asked. To them, the Volt was nothing more than the automotive equivalent of a mudblood.

2011 Chevrolet Volt

2011 Chevrolet Volt

Enlarge Photo

But just like that clever wizarding mudblood Hermione Granger from Harry Potter, the Chevrolet Volt has proven time and time again that it is capable of being just as much an electric car as the all-electric 2011 Nissan Leaf.

Driving 2,500 miles on a single tank of gasoline equates to 2,156 miles of all-electric driving, with just 344 miles of gasoline-fueled driving. Put another way, with the Volt’s 9 gallon gas tank, an average equivalent fuel economy of 277 miles per gallon.

2011 Chevrolet Volt

2011 Chevrolet Volt

Enlarge Photo

That’s enough to make cars like the gasoline-sipping 2011 Toyota Prius look like a Humvee.

Although most Volt drivers are unlikely to achieve such a long period between fill-ups, perhaps its time for Chevrolet - and the electric car industry - to acknowledge that when driven mindfully on sub 35 mile trips the 2011 Chevrolet Volt is most definitely more electric than car.



Source: All Cars Electric